Disability pensions and work ability
The number of people retiring on disability pension has clearly decreased in the last few decades. Nevertheless, working life still ends prematurely for many due to disability. Work ability is increasingly supported in various ways to make it easier than before to continue working despite health problems.
Research into disability pensions and the support of work ability provides valuable information for the development of pensions and rehabilitation, as well as for a broader public discourse.

Disability retirement
Around 20,000 persons retire on a disability pension each year. Of them, around 5,000 retire on a partial disability pension. It is important to study disability retirement by population groups to be able to identify factors affecting disability retirement.
The incidence of disability retirement in Finland has clearly declined during this millennium. Over the past ten years, however, the decrease has been more moderate. The reduction has occurred across all diagnostic groups but has been notably steeper for pensions granted due to somatic diseases compared to those granted due to mental disorders.
In 2018 and 2019, the incidence of disability retirement in Finland increased. This was mainly due to an increasing number of applicants with a history of unemployment, suggesting the influence of the activation model for unemployment security that was in effect at the time. Since then, retirement on disability pensions has once again decreased.
Disability retirement has notably declined among individuals aged 45 to 59. Conversely, among those over 60, the incidence of disability retirement has increased. This trend is influenced by the rising minimum retirement age for the old-age pension as a result of the 2017 pension reform. A significant portion of disability pensions starting after the age of 60 are partial disability pensions. In younger age groups, retirement on a partial disability pension has also decreased.
The share of women receiving a disability pension has increased. At the beginning of the century, the incidence of disability retirement was higher among men than women, but currently, a clear majority of new disability pensioners are women.
More on other sites:
Publications:
- Laaksonen 2020. Retirement on disability pension: trends, current situation, future outlook ( Summary in English, Julkari)
- Laaksonen 2024. Incidence of disability retirement among persons aged 50 and over by birth cohort (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Laaksonen et al. 2019. Did the Activation Model for Unemployment Security affect applying for and receiving a disability pension? (Summary in English, Julkaisuarkisto Valto)
- Laaksonen & Nyman 2019. Retirement due to disability has decreased among the unemployed and older Finns of working age (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Laaksonen & Rantala 2023. Mistä työkyvyttömyyseläkkeellä olevien määrän väheneminen johtuu? [what causes the reduction in number of disability pension recipients?]. (Julkari)
In the early 2000s, disability retirement due to mental disorders and somatic diseases decreased clearly. In recent years, however, the incidence of disability retirement due to mental disorders has increased. It follows that mental disorders play an increasingly greater role in disability retirement.
Currently, around one third of all disability pensions are granted due to mental disorders. Most disability pensions granted due to mental disorders begin as temporary pension. This type of disability retirement typically starts at a younger-than-average age. Already more than half of all disability pension recipients receive the pension due to mental disorders.
The spectrum of mental disorders is varied. Disability retirement based on depression and anxiety disorders has increased while disability retirement due to psychotic disorders has decreased.
Long term, disability retirement based on mental disorders has decreased in older age groups but increased steadily in younger age groups throughout the 2000s. It is not clear whether mental disorders among young people have increased or whether, for whatever reason, they lead to disability retirement more frequently than before.

Publications:
- Laaksonen 2020. Retirement on disability pension:
trends, current situation, future outlook (Summary in English, Julkari) - Laaksonen & Nyman 2019. Retirement due to disability has decreased among the unemployed and older Finns of working age (Summary in English, Julkari
- Laaksonen et al. 2021. The incidence of disability retirement due to mental disorders has increased among young people but decreased in older age groups (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Pirkola et al. 2019. The importance of clinical and labour market histories in psychiatric disability retirement. Analysis of the comprehensive Finnish national level RETIRE data (SpringerLink)
Disability retirement is clearly more frequent among the older age groups. It increases particularly among those who are 50 or older. Nevertheless, disability retirement among the young has gained much attention and caused great concern since, unlike in the older age groups, disability retirement of the young has increased steadily throughout the 2000s.
Mental disorders are clearly the most common cause of disability pensions among young people. Underlying the growth in the disability retirement incidence among the young is an increase in the incidence of pensions granted due to mood disorders (depression and anxiety).
A considerable proportion of young people who begin receiving disability pensions are so severely affected by their illness that participating in working life is not a feasible expectation. Around half of those who transition to a disability pension between the ages of 18 and 29 receive only a pension from Kela, meaning they have no work history at all. Even among those covered by the earnings-related pension scheme, young recipients generally have far less work experience than their peers in the general population.
Most disability pensions of the young are granted as fixed-term disability pensions. Fixed-term pensions are less often converted to permanent pensions in the younger age groups compared to the older age groups. However, young people tend to be on fixed-term pensions for a longer time than older people.
Incidence of disability retirement based on mental disorders for under-35-year-old men / 10,000 person-years
| Diagnosis | 2007 | 2011 | 2015 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 15.6 | 16.7 | 18.4 | 20.7 |
| Depression | 3.2 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Mania and bipolar disorder | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1 | 0.9 |
| Anxiety | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| Psychotic disorders | 7.1 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Other mental disorders | 2.7 | 4 | 4.6 | 4.7 |
Incidence of disability retirement based on mental disorders for under-35-year-old women / 10,000 person-years
| Diagnosis | 2007 | 2011 | 2015 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 15.4 | 16.1 | 19.3 | 23.1 |
| Depression | 5.7 | 5.9 | 7.7 | 10.6 |
| Mania and bipolar disorder | 2 | 2 | 1.9 | 2.5 |
| Anxiety | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 3.1 |
| Psychotic disorders | 4.3 | 4 | 4 | 3.7 |
| Other mental disorders | 2 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 3.3 |
Publications:
- Koskenvuo et al. 2021. Selvitys kuntoutustukea saaneista. Aiempi tutkimus ja rekisteriseuranta vuonna 2015 kuntoutustuen aloittaneista [Survey on recipients of the fixed-term disability pension. Previous study and register follow-up of new recipients of the fixed-term disability pension in 2015] (Helda)
- Laaksonen 2020. Work resumption after a fixed-term disability pension: changes over time during a period of decreasing incidence of disability retirement (Julkari)
- Laaksonen et al. 2021. The incidence of disability retirement due to mental disorders has increased among young people but decreased in older age groups (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Laaksonen & Sten-Gahmberg 2025. Nuorena työkyvyttömyyseläkkeelle siirtyneiden työhistoria (working history of young retirees on a disability pension) (Julkari)
The incidence of disability retirement is not even in all socioeconomic classes. Manual workers run a clearly higher risk of disability retirement than upper non-manual employees. A low educational level and a low income are also associated with a higher risk of disability retirement. The higher risk of disability retirement of the lower socioeconomic classes is largely explained by physically more strenuous working conditions. The health of manual workers also tends to be poorer than that of upper non-manual employees.
However, in the 2000s, socioeconomic differences in disability retirement have narrowed as retirement has decreased more in the lower than in the upper social classes. Socioeconomic differences in disability retirement are larger in disability retirements caused by somatic illnesses than those caused by mental disorders.

Publications:
- Kiander et al. 2021. Työkyvyttömyyden kehitys ja eläkkeiden rahoitus [the development of disability and pension financing] (Julkari)
- Laaksonen & Nyman 2019. Retirement due to disability has decreased among the unemployed and older Finns of working age (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Polvinen 2016. Socioeconomic status and disability retirement in Finland. Causes, changes over time and mortality (Julkari)
- Polvinen et al. 2014. The contribution of major diagnostic causes to socioeconomic differences in disability retirement (Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health)
- Polvinen et al. 2016. Socioeconomic Differences in Cause-Specific Disability Retirement in Finland, 1988 to 2009 (Julkari)
Disability retirement is more common in the public than the private sector. In particular, the incidence of partial disability retirement is higher in the public than the private sector, while the difference in the incidence of full disability retirement between the sectors is small.
The differences in age and gender structure of public and private sector employees partly explain why the incidence is higher in the public sector. Public sector employees are older than private sector employees, and most public sector employees are women.
Sector differences in occupational structures, on the other hand, do not explain the differences in incidence. The differences in pension financing and the definition of disability may partly explain the higher incidence of disability retirement in the public sector.

Read more on Etk.fi:
Publications:
- Laaksonen 2020. Retirement on disability pension: trends, current situation, future outlook (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Polvinen 2021. Differences in disability retirement between municipal and private sector employees (Abstract in English, Julkari)
- Polvinen & Laaksonen 2023. The contribution of age, gender and occupational group to the higher risk of disability retirement among Finnish public sector employees (Julkari)
The number of people aged over 60 transitioning to a disability pension has increased sharply since 2017. This is due to the rise in the statutory retirement age agreed in the pension reform, which means that people can now retire on a disability pension at an older age than before. In 2025, 41 per cent of the new earnings-related disability pensioners were over 60.
Partial disability pensions are common among people aged over 60. The number of people over 60 transitioning to a partial disability pension has increased steadily since the early 2000s. At present, around one third of disability pensions granted to those over 60 are partial disability pensions.
The transition to disability pension among people over 60 is also influenced by the fact that, after this age, work capacity in the private sector is assessed only in relation to the applicant’s own occupation.
There is a marked peak in the number of individuals transitioning to disability pension at age 60.
A years-of-service pension can be granted to a person aged 63 or older who has had a long career in strenuous and demanding work and whose work ability has declined, but not to the extent required for a disability pension. However, take-up of this pension has been limited. Recipients of the years-of-service pension are typically men, persons with low levels of education and stable employment histories. In most cases, the underlying causes are musculoskeletal disorders.
Publications:
- Laaksonen 2024. Incidence of disability retirement about persons aged 50 and over by birth cohort (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Laaksonen 2023. Did the pension reform affect the transition to disability pensions? In Nivalainen, S. & Ilmakunnas, I. & Laaksonen, M. (eds.) Studies on changes in retirement on old-age and disability pension after the 2017 pension reform (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Riekhoff & Polvinen 2025. Arduous careers in times of longer working lives : The role of the years-of-service pension and other early exit routes (Julkari)
A person may be granted a disability pension if their ability to work has been reduced without interruptions for at least one year. As a rule, loss of income for shorter periods of disability is compensated with a sickness allowance. The longer the sickness allowance has continued, the higher the risk of disability retirement.
During the sickness allowance period, efforts are made to determine the need for rehabilitation and support a return to work. 70 per cent of those who have received a sickness allowance for the maximum limit of one year retire directly on a disability pension. Of the remaining 30 per cent, just over half apply for a disability pension but are not granted one at this stage. Just under half do not apply for a disability pension. They often return to paid employment. Those whose application for a disability pension is rejected often receive an unemployment benefit.
Unemployment and disability are often intertwined in many ways. It is common to receive unemployment benefits before retiring on a disability pension. Although rehabilitation is the primary alternative relative to disability retirement, vocational rehabilitation before disability retirement is rather rare and occurs mainly in the last few years before disability retirement.
Publications:
- Blomgren et al. 2023. Sairauspäivärahakausien tarkistuspisteet : Kuntoutuksen ja työhön paluun toteutuminen [checkpoints for sickness allowance periods implementation of rehabilitation and return to work] (Julkaisuarkisto Valto)
- Laaksonen et al. 2014. Sickness allowance, rehabilitation and unemployment history of disability retirees (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Laaksonen et al. 2023. Impact of a Finnish reform adding new sickness absence checkpoints on rehabilitation and labor market outcomes: an interrupted time series analysis (Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health)
- Perhoniemi et al. 2021. Mitä sairauspäivärahan enimmäisajan täytyttyä? Toimeentulon lähteet kahden vuoden seurannassa [What next after the maximum period of the sickness allowance is up? Sources of income in a two-year follow-up] (Sosiaalilääketieteellinen aikakauslehti)
In 2025, 38 per cent of all disability pension applications were rejected. Most often applications are rejected because the applicant is not considered disabled enough or because the disability has not continued long enough. Granting a disability pension requires an uninterrupted period of disability that spans at least one year.
The share of rejected disability pension applications has increased in the 2000s. The increase in the rejection rate is broadly similar across different background factors, such as gender and level of education, and regardless of the medical condition on which the application is based. Changes in the characteristics of disability pension applicants therefore do not explain the rise in the rejection rate. However, without certain changes in the applicant profile – such as the growing proportion of applicants aged 60 and over – the rejection rate would have increased even more.
A large share of those whose disability pension applications have been rejected end up on a disability pension over the following years. Receiving an unemployment or sickness allowance is also common after a rejected disability pension application. Many rejected applicants have varied sources of income in the years following the rejection. This indicates that the applicants typically experience at least some degree of work ability problems, even if their disability pension application is rejected.

Publications:
- Laaksonen 2020. Retirement on disability pension: trends, current situation, future outlook (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Laaksonen & Nyman 2018. Työkyvyttömyyseläkkeiden hylkäysosuuden kasvu 2007–2016 [Growth in share of rejected disability pensions 2007–2016] (Julkari)
- Laaksonen et al. 2025. Why have rejections of disbility pensions increased? (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Laaksonen et al. 2017. Labor market position after a rejection of a disability pension application: a register-based cohort study (Julkari)
- Perhoniemi et al. 2018. What next after a rejected disability pension application? Unemployment, sickness and rehabilitation benefits and new disability pension decisions in a four-year follow-up (Summary in English, Julkari)
Supporting work ability and continuing at work
Supporting continued working through vocational rehabilitation has increased in recent decades. During a period of a daily sickness allowance or a temporary disability pension (also called a cash rehabilitation allowance), efforts are made to facilitate a return to work through treatment or rehabilitation, even when the disability is prolonged. Partial disability pensions allow persons to continue working part-time despite difficulties with their ability to work.
Raising the employment rate and extending working lives are important objectives for society. Achieving these goals requires that the population’s ability to work remains sufficiently strong, enabling people to remain in employment even when they experience challenges in this area.
Finns’ self-assessed ability to work improved during the first decade of the 2000s, but since then, there has been no similar positive development. Among younger age groups, the perceived ability to work has even declined. These trends mirror the changes observed in the transition to disability pensions.
The proportion of people who consider themselves fully fit for work begins to decrease at around the age of 50. As the retirement age increases, it can be anticipated that challenges with the ability to work will become more common towards the end of people’s careers.
The number of working years completed in full health by those over the age of 50 has increased. How-ever, employment has also risen during periods when the ability to work has been limited.
The proportion of people with a partial ability to work has increased, particularly among the unem-ployed. Around half of them perceive themselves to have a reduced ability to work. Nevertheless, the largest group of people with a partial ability to work is found among the employed. Therefore, it is cru-cial to support both the unemployed and employed to help them maintain their ability to work and re-main in employment.

Read more on Etk.fi:
- Laaksonen 2025. Osatyökykyisten määrä kasvaa mutta entistä useampi heistä on työssä [the number of persons with a partial ability to work is growing, but an increasing number of them are employed], (Blog in Finnish, 11 March 2025, Etk.fi)
- Laaksonen 2022. Eläkeikä nousee, riittääkö terveys? [the retirement age is rising, but are peple healthy enough?] (Blog in Finnish, 27 October 2022, Etk.fi)
Publications:
- Laaksonen et al. 2025. Itse arvioidun työkyvyn kehitys työmarkkina-aseman mukaan: Onko osatyökykyisissä hyödyntämätöntä työvoimapotentiaalia? [development of the perceived ability to work according to labour market status – is there untapped workforce potential among those with a partial ability to work?] (Julkari)
- Laaksonen et al. 2022. Changes in healthy and unhealthy working life expectancies among older working-age people in Finland, 2000–2017 (Julkari)
- Kainulainen et al. 2023. Self-rated work ability as a risk factor for disability retirement (Oxford Academic)
A person with a reduced work ability is entitled to vocational rehabilitation funded by the earnings-related pension provider, provided it is determined that they are at significant risk of having to retire on a disability pension within the next few years.
The most common forms of vocational rehabilitation provided by pension providers are work trials either with one’s current employer or another, as well as retraining for a different occupation. Vocational rehabilitation organised by earnings-related pension providers is notably more frequent among women than men. The gender gap is particularly pronounced in rehabilitation initiated due to mental disorders. This type of rehabilitation is also more prevalent in larger organisations, which may be explained by their greater capacity to offer part-time work and other flexible arrangements compared to smaller employers.
Studies have not provided clear evidence of vocational rehabilitation significantly improving the ability to work or preventing retirement on a disability pension, at least not in the long term. As rehabilitation practices have been in transition in recent years, there is no research data available on the current situation regarding the impact of vocational rehabilitation.
Publications:
- Laaksonen et al. 2019. Individual- and company-level predictors of receiving vocational rehabilitation: a multilevel study of Finnish private sector workplaces (Julkari)
- Laaksonen et al. 2022. The impact of vocational rehabilitation on employment outcomes: A regression discontinuity approach (Julkari)
- Leinonen et al. 2019. The effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation on work participation : a propensity score matched analysis using nationwide register data (Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health)
- Leinonen et al. 2020. Effects of participation in vocational rehabilitation within the earnings-related pension scheme on disability retirement (Abstract in English, Duodecim)
How well rehabilitation processes work has been studied mainly through interviews with both rehabilitation professionals and rehabilitees. Key factors for successful rehabilitation include adequate support and monitoring throughout the entire process. Moreover, both professionals and rehabilitees consider the following as essential for the success of rehabilitation:
- careful planning and correct timing of rehabilitation,
- rehabilitee’s motivation,
- effective cooperation between the stakeholders involved in the rehabilitation,
- the rehabilitee’s possibilities to impact the rehabilitation process,
- taking the rehabilitee’s individual needs into account, and
- supporting a return to work after rehabilitation.
According to studies, more attention should be paid to the period following work trials financed by pension providers and subsequent employment. A short work trial alone may not be sufficient to ensure a return to work.
Understanding the processes involved in returning to work and evaluating the outcomes of rehabilitation requires monitoring rehabilitees over a sufficiently long period.
According to studies, it is not meaningful to evaluate rehabilitation processes solely from the perspective of a single system, such as only from the perspective of rehabilitation under the earnings-related pension system. Many rehabilitees require services from various actors, either in turns or at the same time. There are challenges in the cooperation and division of responsibilities among different actors, and information does not always flow smoothly, for example, between the earnings-related pension system and employment services.
Read more on Etk.fi:
Publications:
- Liukko 2020. Decision practices for vocational rehabilitation under the earnings-related pension scheme and the effectiveness and impact of vocational rehabilitation (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Liukko 2021. Työeläkekuntoutuksen vaikuttavuuden kehittäminen ja työkykyajattelu : työeläkelaitosten asiantuntijoiden haastatteluihin perustuva tutkimus [Developing impact of vocational rehabilitation and thoughts on working capacity: study based on interviews with experts from earnings-related pension providers] (Julkari)
- Liukko & Kuuva 2015. Cooperation in the management of working capacity problems (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Liukko & Pasanen & Sten-Gahmberg 2025. Functionality and effectiveness of rehabilitation under the earnings-related pension system from the participants’ perspective. A study baed on interviews with individuals participating in work trials. (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Liukko & Pasanen & Sten-Gahmberg 2024. Rehabilitees’ perspectives on the benefits and development areas of rehabilitation under the earnings-related pension system. Study based on interviews with rehabilitees participating in a work trial. (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Liukko & Pasanen & Sten-Gahmberg 2023. Rehabilitees’ perspective on rehabilitation planning under the earnings-related pension system. Study bsed on interviews with rehabilitees participating in a work trial. (Summary in English, Julkari)
A disability pension may be awarded either as a temporary disability pension (also called a cash rehabilitation allowance) or as a permanent disability pension. The disability pension is granted as a temporary pension if it is regarded possible that the employee’s work ability can be restored after the onset of the benefit. The share of temporary disability pensions of all new disability pensions has increased. Currently, clearly more than half of all new disability pensions begin as temporary disability pensions.
A large share of temporary disability pensions is later converted into permanent pensions. The share of rehabilitees returning to work has been fairly small. Around half of those who transitioned to a full or partial disability pension in 2018 were still receiving a partial disability pension four years later. Around 20 per cent were employed and a smaller proportion were unemployed. Nearly all those who returned to work had been working before starting to receive a temporary disability pension.
An increasing share of persons receiving a temporary disability pension has returned to work while a decreasing share has transferred to a permanent disability pension. In addition, an increasingly higher share of temporary disability pensions continues for more than four years.
There are notable differences between diagnostic groups when it comes to returning to work after receiving a temporary disability pension. In particular, the trend in returning to work among those who received temporary disability pension for mental disorders has been weak. Although they are transitioning to permanent disability pensions less frequently than before, the rate of return to work has hardly increased at all.

Publications:
- Koskenvuo et al. 2021.: Selvitys kuntoutustukea saaneista : Aiempi tutkimus ja rekisteriseuranta vuonna 2015 kuntoutustuen aloittaneista [Review on fixed-term disability pension recipients: Previous study and register follow-up on new recipients of the fixed-term disability pension in 2015] (Helda)
- Laaksonen 2021. Work Resumption after a Fixed-Term Disability Pension: Changes over Time during a Period of Decreasing Incidence of Disability Retirement (Julkari)
- Laaksonen & Gould 2014. Return to work after temporary disability pension in Finland (Julkari)
- Polvinen et al. 2025. Pathways into and out of temporary disability retirement: an 8-year sequence analysis study in Finland. (European Journal of Public Health).
The share of partial disability pensions of all new disability pensions has increased in recent years. Currently nearly every third earnings-related disability pension is granted as a partial pension. Most (around 80%) partial disability pension recipients continue working while drawing the pension. The average duration of a partial disability pension is just under three years, and most recipients work throughout the time they receive the pension.
Partial disability pension recipients differ from full disability pension recipients in many respects. Nearly 70 per cent of partial disability pension recipients are women, and many receive the pension due to musculoskeletal diseases.
Nearly half of all partial disability pension recipients are public sector employees, one-third are private sector employees, and about 5 per cent are self-employed. Less than one-fifth were unemployed before starting their partial disability pension. Most recipients have at least an intermediate educational level and one-third have completed higher education.
A transition from partial disability retirement to full disability retirement is relatively rare. During a four-year follow-up period, one third of the 20–58-year-olds who retired on a partial disability pension transitioned to a full disability pension while half continued drawing a partial disability pension. The rest either returned to work or became unemployed.
Probability of transition from partial DP to full DP and to other states during follow-up, %
| Diagnosis | Continued on partial DP | Moved to full DP | Moved to employment | Moved to unemployment | Moved to old-age pension | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 52 | 33 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal diseases | 56 | 32 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Mental disorders | 41 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Other diseases | 53 | 33 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Read more on Etk.fi:
Publications:
- Polvinen 2021. Työkyvyttömyyseläkkeelle siirtymisen erot kunta-alan ja yksityisen sektorin palkansaajilla [differences in disability retirement between municipal sector and private sector wage earners] (Julkari)
- Polvinen & Laaksonen 2022. Determinants of transition from partial to full disability pension: a register study from Finland (Julkari)
- Polvinen & Rantala & Laaksonen 2023. Osatyökyvyttömyyseläkeläisten työssäkäynti ja ansiotyön merkitys toimeentulossa. [employment and the importance of paid work for the income of partial disability pensioners]. (Työpoliittinen aikakauskirja)
- Polvinen et al. 2018. Working while on a disability pension in Finland: Association of diagnosis and financial factors to employment (Scandinavian Journal of Public Health)
Retirement on a disability pension does not necessarily mean stopping work altogether. While drawing a pension, disability pension recipients may earn up to 40 per cent and partial disability pension recipients up to 60 per cent of their established average pre-disability earnings.
When a disability benefit is granted in the form of a partial disability pension, the individual is considered to have some work ability left and to be able to continue working while drawing a partial disability pension. However, the individual is not required to work. Nearly 80 per cent of individuals on a partial disability pension work while drawing the pension.
The work ability of individuals on a full disability pension, on the other hand, is much weaker than that of individuals on a partial disability pension. Hence, working while drawing a full disability pension is less common. Of the recipients of a full disability pension, an ample 10 per cent work while drawing the pension. The majority of those receiving a partial disability pension continue to work throughout the entire duration of their pension.
Women, those with a higher education and those recently retired on a disability pension work more often while receiving a pension than men, those with a primary education and those who have received a disability pension for a longer time. Working while receiving a disability pension is also more common among public sector employees and those with a long working life than among private sector employees and those with a shorter working life.

Read more on Etk.fi:
Publications:
- Polvinen & Rantala & Laaksonen 2023. Osatyökyvyttömyyseläkeläisten työssäkäynti ja ansiotyön merkitys toimeentulossa. [employment and the importance of paid work for the income of partial disability pensioners]. (Työpoliittinen aikakauskirja)
- Polvinen et al. 2018. Working while on a disability pension in Finland: Association of diagnosis and financial factors to employment (Scandinavian Journal of Public Health)
In 2024, the average total pension of all disability pensioners was approximately 1,300 euros per month. This is clearly less than what old-age pensioners received. Disability pensioners often have a meagre income.
Disability pensions have decreased slightly on average in the 2000s. This is because disability pensioners are younger than before and have retired on a disability pension at a younger age than before.
The share of disability pensioners receiving a national pension only has increased while the share of those receiving an earnings-related pension has decreased. The guarantee pension that was introduced in 2011 has improved the situation for many disability pensioners since the proportion of disability pensioners who receive this pension benefit is large.
There are clear differences in income levels and financial satisfaction among groups of disability pension recipients. Those with a higher education, those who perceive their health to be better, those who live in a shared household, or those who continue to be in employment are more satisfied with their financial situation than those with a lower education, those who perceive their health to be poorer, those who live alone, or those who are not in employment.
The income of disability pensioners remains lower than average also in old-age retirement since the disability pension is converted into an old-age pension of the same amount when the individual reaches their old-age retirement age. Old-age pensioners with previous disability pension experience more economic difficulties in covering, for example, housing and health care costs than old-age pensioners without a previous disability pension.
Publications:
- Kuivalainen et al. 2022. Pensions and pensioners’ economic welfare 1995–2015 (Julkari)
- Polvinen et al. 2019. Explanations for economic difficulties among old-age pensioners previously on disability pension (European Journal of Public Health)
- Polvinen et al. 2025. Over-55-year-old current and former disability
pensioners’ experiences of financial well-being (Summary in English, Julkari) - Rantala & Laaksonen 2022. Ovatko työkyvyttömyyseläkeläisten eläkkeet pienentyneet? [Have the pensions of disability pension recipients become smaller?] (Yhteiskuntapolitiikka)
- Rantala et al. 2017. The economic welfare of disability pensioners in the 2000s (Summary in English, Julkari)
- Rantala et al. 2024. Three layers of the disability pension: Income and income structure of new disability pensioners in 2020 ( (Summary in English, Julkari)